WOC mapping   Leave a comment

I have issues with the WOC mapping. I can't really complain, because technically the maps are exactly according to IOF specifications, but I think the representation of open areas and forest is misleading.
Below is a sample video from the open race on Monday, and the relevant map section. You can clearly see that there are areas marked as forest, that have only scattered saplings, barely 1-1.5m high, and 100% visibility above them (the best example is on the route from 9 to 10). There are also very similar areas marked as semi-open. As far as I know, there were several mistakes caused by this mapping in the long qualification race, and it messed up my open race quite a bit (I would probably have run faster with a contour-only map). I can also note that we noticed no similar terrain in the model map.
Officially the map is correct – the IOF symbol for rough open land (403) states: "Heath, moorland, felled areas, newly planted areas (trees lower than ca. 1m) or other generally open land with rough ground vegetation, heather or tall grass", so anything with trees above 1m can be classified as forest. I would map many of these areas as semi-open and not forest.

Posted 10/07/2013 by dchissick in Uncategorized

Tagged with

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: